j.mochi :
I have to do a paper about the Environmental Protection Agency, and whether or not they’re doing their job. I want to be con EPA just because it sounds more interesting (in my class’s opinion at least; I asked them). The thing is, I can’t find any complaints against the EPA to support my con EPA thesis. So I ask you Yahoo answers: Is the EPA doing their job? If they are, should I just be pro-EPA, despite the fact that it’ll be most likely unbearably boring? And if you think they aren’t doing their job, please give an good explanation why.
radiology technologist
Related posts:
- Why is environmental protection a “liberal” idea? Dawei : I’ve never understood why this came to be....
- who is the most responsible for our future environment? fog-or-smoke : I am thinking about government, manufacturers, consumers or...
- In what ways do you feel that the environmental protection agency could be improved? Sky G : In what ways do you feel that...
- In the argument on which we should prioritize first, poverty reduction or environmental protection how do yo? Sam K : How do you refute the point that...
- What are three things you can start doing TODAY to help our environment and planet? Are you willing to start? Nash77 : Sure some people don’t see how they can...
{ 3 comments }
The EPA cares more about taxes and useless regulations than helping the environment. Did you know that it is legal to burn motor oil mixed with diesel fuel to heat crops at night, but illegal to use clean vegetable oil as fuel in a diesel engine because it isn’t an EPA approved fuel?
With any govement job they need move people out there and less bosses in the office
They’re doing too good a job.
I’ve had to increase my cigarette smoking to 7 packs a day, just to pick up the slack in the depleading smog levels.
Good thing for me, that 2nd hand smoke is the one that kills.